my account    view basket

 
 
Home Shop Farms CSA Forum Events Newsletter News Blogs Photos

Re Rustica

  (Squaw Valley, California)
love your food!
[ Member listing ]

Saving the Sierras by Killing One Tree at a Time - now with an address!


Saws and axes are still good enough for thinning trees.  Shovels are still good enough for planting trees.  And, it turns out, tents are still good enough for living in!

Saws and axes are still good enough for thinning trees. Shovels are still good enough for planting trees. And, it turns out, tents are still good enough for living in!

We love trees. Who doesn’t? Yet we cut down a big one - almost 4 feet across. Then we cut down another! And then we cut down many smaller ones in our farm’s Sierra forest.

Why?

The monoculture on our farm is unnatural. Just a few hundred years ago, the pines - which provided better lumber - were cut down to help build Fresno, Clovis, and even far away cities. John Muir and other primary sources describe, besides the lumbering of the forest, cutting the trees to make way for sheep and other domesticated livestock.

The oaks were better able to survive this crisis. Even after the big oaks were cut down for wood, their acorns sprouted up. Now, the forest is mostly oak - several kinds of oak.

The larger herbivores that would have checked the growth of these oaks were destroyed by over hunting - they competed with the livestock. So the trees today grow too close together, and the lack of diversity further encourages disease. All trees increase the amount of water in an ecosystem, but the large sequoias and redwoods excelled at it. Now the forests burn so easy.

We are thinning the trees to a healthy density, and then a bit more so we can make room for sequoias, redwoods, pinions, junipers, and other evergreens. We will also be planting apples, cherries, pears, raspberries, blackberries and other native fruits.

A healthy forest is a diverse forest, but ours will still lack those necessary large herbivores! They will come when the habitat is restored. The carnovores and the necrovores will also return.

We see it whenever we reclaim land for our crops. An increase in biodiversity will lead to more diversity. And this healthy forest will improve the yields in our vegetable and fruit patches.

In other news,

If you’d like to come see our progress - or help in the lumberjacking or tree planting - you can more easily find us now. After long days of trying to talk to a human being (alas, time not spent blogging or doing real farm work!), the County has finally (kindly) given to us an address! There was some problem that we could not get an address without a house, but after a long discussion with the County, they have decided to recognize our tents as residences. Now we can vote, too!

We’ll be blogging more about this later, but were so happy that we had to share it today.


 
 

Why is an acre 43560 square feet?

The word “acre” is derived from Old English æcer (originally meaning “open field”, cognate to west coast Norwegian language “ækre” and Swedish “åker”, German Acker, Latin ager and Greek ????? (agros). -Wikipedia

An acre is 43,560 Square Feet, but why?

Here is a great answer from YourHub.com:

Neolithic Megalithic Measurements

By about 5,000 BC, all sorts of things were being invented, not least among them a standardized unit of measurement. This unit of measurement was based on the circumference of the Earth.

From experiments and observation, people understood that the earth was a sphere and that it rotated on its axis. Rather than measuring the time of rotation based on either the moon or the sun (the sun and moon rise and set at different times each day and are not constant), people measured a “day” by the time it took for a star to return to its original position in the sky: stars do not “move” in the same observable way that the sun and moon do.

Well, as soon as it was decided that stars were better to measure the rotation of the earth by, it was observed that the earth rotated around the sun: a star would not return to its original position for 366 days! Thus, in original geometry, the circle had 366 degrees, not 360 (it was shortened by 6 degrees by the Sumerians to make math easier).

A person could stand outside at night and divide the horizon into 366 degrees, and then observe the time it took for a star to pass between that one degree by use of a pendulum. If the pendulum’s length was “correct” (a standard size), it would take 366 swings for a star to pass between the two degrees on the horizon. The star they used was Venus (actually a planet), and because Venus had a changing speed during the year, they calibrated their pendulums on the day of the year when Venus moved the slowest.

The length of this pendulum was the foundation of all modern units of measurement, and is known to archeologists as the “Megalithic Yard.” The Megalithic Yard is similar in size to the Meter, and measures roughly 2.722 Feet (82.966 Centimeters). The Megalithic Yard was divided into 40 units, called “Megalithic Inches.”

By making a cube with each side the length of 1/10 of these Megalithic Yards (4 MI) and filling the cube, standardized units of volume was developed. This unit of volume is now called the Pint. A cube with a length of 8 MI is called the Gallon. A cube with a length of 16 MI is called the Bushel.

If the same volume is filled with water or seed, units of weight can be found. Grain (Barley seed was used by the ancients) occupies about 125% of the volume of water when placed in a cubical container. When a Pint is filled with barley, it weighs one pound. However, some of the ancients filled the Pint with water, and called it a pound. The difference between a Pound Avoirdupois and a Pound Troy is thus explained.

When 40 MY are squared, the resulting area is known as the Irish Acre (23,520 square feet). 75 MY x 100 MY equals the Scottish Acre.

A Sumerian Wheel of 360 Degrees

So where does the modern acre come in? As the megalithic peoples based all numbers off of the 366 degrees of the earth’s rotation, the Sumerians based all their numbers off 360 degrees of the earth’s rotation.

6 MY described a “Megalithic Rod.” When an area is made measuring 4 MR x 40 MR, you get the modern Acre. This can also be described as being 16 sections measuring 360 MY in area. The modern acre originated from a time after the Sumerian improvement of rounding down from 366 degrees to 360 degrees.

Further evidence of the modern acre being the result of Sumerian improvement can be seen in how the modern acre of 43560 square Feet may be divided evenly into 121 sections of 360 square feet: 11 sections of 360 feet is 3,960 Feet, and 11 sections of 3,960 feet is an Acre.

11 sections of 11 sections seems arbitrary, but many units of area are designed on this number: the square Mile may be divided into 121 (11 x 11) sections of 230,400 square Feet, with each section’s side equal to 1/11 of a mile (480 Feet). These 121 pieces may be divided into 640 sections of 360 feet, similar to how an American Square Mile is divided into 640 Sections (each section equaling an acre).

Modern units of measurement are based on older, Sumerian-influenced methods of measurements.

Though the Sumerian-influenced descendants of the megalithic peoples attempted to simplify the megalithic accounting, they still used the same methods of dividing land into sections of 360 square feet.

French, American and Minoan Wheels

The ease of the Sumerian system was eventually improved by bringing it into conformity with a base-ten system. The French are usually given credit for this “metric” system. The Meter was developed using the Sumerian 360 degree circle as a starting point. Thus, the metric system is based off of the Sumerian improvement to the megalithic system.

Thomas Jefferson, like the French when they developed the metric system, wanted to improve the Sumerian system by bringing it into conformity with a base-10 system. He attempted to introduce to the newly formed United States his better form of measurement based on a 360 degree circle. But, unlike the Meter in France, the Jeffersonian Units of measurement never caught on.

Was Thomas Jefferson’s improvement new? 1,000 Jefferson Feet (Jefferson’s units were to be referred to as Jefferson Feet, Jefferson Miles, etc.), was set to equal 360 MY. However, 1,000 Minoan feet had equaled the same distance for thousands of years before Jefferson: the ancient Minoans had the same idea as Jefferson and ought to be given credit for bringing the Sumerian improvement into a base-ten system.

Suggested Reading:

1) Alexander Thom, including the Megalithic Sites in Britain (1955), Megalithic Sites in Britain (1967), Megalithic Sites in Britain (1968) and A Statistical Examiniation of Megalithic Remains in Britain and Brittany (1978).

2) D. C. Heggie, Megalithic Science (1981).

3) J.W. Graham, Palaces of Crete (1962)

4) Christopher Knight, Civilization One. A good review of the literature can be found in this book, but, while this book serves as a good review, the reader is cautioned: Knight’s ability to succinctly compile the vast body of archeological research is amazing, but the last few chapters of his book (which resort to explaining the knowledge of the ancients as being due not to their own ingenuity, but through the actions of angels and other daemons) is highly questionable.

Tags:
 
 
RSS feed for Re Rustica blog. Right-click, copy link and paste into your newsfeed reader

Calendar

Search

Navigation

Topics

Tag Cloud

Feeds

BlogRoll



home | about us | contact LocalHarvest |

© 1999-2008 LocalHarvest, Inc.
Your use of this site constitutes your acceptance of our