|
Longtime readers will recall that about 15 months ago
we wrote
about a new mandate requiring that all raw almonds grown in the U.S. be "pasteurized"
via steam or a toxic chemical process – while still labeled "raw." Pasteurization is
meant to protect the public from germs that thrive where sloppy agriculture and
food handling are practiced. Critics (like us) say that if everyone would wash
their hands and keep animal manure off the nuts, then pasteurization would be
unnecessary and "raw" could actually mean what it’s always meant.
Recently, the Cornucopia Institute helped organize a group of fifteen almond
growers and wholesale nut handlers who have sued the USDA in federal court over
this issue. They are seeking a repeal of the controversial pasteurization
program, claiming the USDA exceeded its authority when putting this program in
place.
The pasteurization program, crafted by the USDA in concert with the Almond
Board of California, has created a goodly amount of backlash within the almond
industry. Tens of thousands of consumers have complained to the USDA. A number
of natural food retailers now prefer to stock foreign-grown almonds, which are
not pasteurized. Some small scale and organic almond growers who direct market
their nuts complain that their businesses are being devastated by
pasteurization.
Both LocalHarvest and Cornucopia are concerned that corporate agribusiness
will keep looking for ways to protect their risky industrial scale practices
from liability – and that they may be successful because they are doing so in
the name of "sanitizing" our food supply. Onerous testing requirements,
pasteurization schemes or irradiation could prove disastrous for smaller,
high-quality agricultural producers and would deprive loyal consumers of fresh,
nutritionally superior, local food. This is a fight we all need to take
seriously. We’ll keep you updated as things unfold. Meanwhile, you can read
more about the lawsuit and financially support the effort at the
Cornucopia website.
|