LocalHarvest Newsletter, October 25, 2013


Welcome back to the LocalHarvest newsletter.

After the shenanigans of the last month it feels almost in poor taste to bring up yet another example of the folly in Washington. I would happily write about something more pleasant if there wasn't so much potential for damage here. The Food and Drug Administration has proposed another set of regulations that, if implemented as written, will negatively affect many LocalHarvest farmers and could very well put some of them out of business. (Careful readers will recall a similar theme in last month's LH newsletter concerning outdoor access for chickens; believe it or not, this is a separate issue.)

These proposed regulations fall under the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), the first overhaul to food safety rules in 75 years. For several years before its 2010 passage, farm and food activists worked hard to make sure that the law would address the known threats to food safety from industrialized agriculture, and differentiate between those activities and ones that are non-threatening. Thanks to their hard work, Congress passed an amendment exempting small-scale farmers, thus protecting them from overly burdensome regulations that shouldn't apply to them. But that didn't entirely work.

Sometimes 'fair' means that the same rules apply to everyone, but sometimes what is fair is to ask the people who engage in the riskiest activities to meet a higher standard than others. In the food system, the riskiest activities are those with a documented history of contamination leading to human illness. In the U.S., those products are bagged salads, sprouts, and much of what is grown downstream from confined animal feedlot operations (CAFOs — aka feedlots). Bagged salads are risky because when the salad leaves are cut they become vulnerable to pathogens; putting these vulnerable greens in a sealed container and removing the oxygen creates an excellent environment for bacterial growth over time. Sprouts are risky because of a history of contaminated seeds and the lack of sufficient post-harvest safety checks. Irrigation water tainted by runoff from CAFOs may contaminate produce. Instead of focusing the regulations on these few problem areas, though, the FDA produced a set of rules strict enough to keep the high-risk products safe and applied it to all produce. According to The Cornucopia Institute, over 90% of the farmers to whom the regulations will apply do not produce these high-risk foods. Requiring them to abide by the same strict rules just isn't fair.

Nor is it smart. Despite being so expensive to implement that the FDA itself predicts the new rules will put some small- and medium-scale produce farmers out of business, asking them to follow these rules is unlikely to make the food system any safer at all because these farmers are not the bad actors. Society will lose an unknowable number of good farmers for nothing, and good food will become harder to find. We think the government has a role in keeping the food system safe, but rules that put good farmers out of business and leave gaping holes in known problem areas is not wise governance.

Several organizations have developed excellent materials through which you can learn more about these proposed regulations and their impact. One good source is The Cornucopia Institute. If you really want to dig in, read their whitepaper on the food safety rules. Another good source is the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition. They offer step by step instructions on how to submit a public comment and what to say. Finally, the Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance offers an in-depth analysis, sample comments, and a downloadable PDF flyer that can be printed and distributed at farmers markets.

I hope that many of you will help protect LocalHarvest's produce farmers by contacting the FDA before the November 15 deadline. Let them know that you want the FDA to create rules that don't unfairly burden the small- and mid-scale farmers from whom you like to get your food. Good food — and good farmers — are worth protecting.

Until next time, take good care and eat well.
Erin

Erin Barnett
Director
LocalHarvest



CSA Farmers: Looking ahead to next year?

This time of year many CSA farmers are saying to themselves, "Next year we have to get the office under control!" If that sounds familiar, this fall might be a good time to take a look at our CSA management software, CSAware. If you would like to see how it works and what it can offer you farm, let us know and we'll set you up for a tour.



From the LocalHarvest Store:

It's late October, and still harvest time in many parts of the country. The cranberry harvest is getting under way, just in time to make a star appearance in your Thanksgiving relish and holiday quick breads. Organic cranberries are hard to find, but we'll have plenty.

And of course, the Thanksgiving turkey! LocalHarvest turkeys are high quality, humanely treated birds for your family's holiday feast. Order yours today.

The fall nut harvest is also upon us, so fresh walnuts, pistachios, chestnuts, pecans, and almonds are all ready for holiday snacking.



Important Vote in Washington: Label GMOs!

We at LocalHarvest think that releasing genetically modified organisms (GMOs) into the natural world and the food system without using the utmost caution was a very, very bad idea. The least the government can do is require that manufacturers label foods containing GMOs. The manufacturers are, understandably, resistant to that idea. Why? They worry that sales could plummet because many people don't want to eat GMOs!

There's an initiative (http://yeson522.com/) on the November ballot in Washington State that would require labeling of products containing GMO ingredients, using standards followed in more than 60 countries. If this ballot measure passes in Washington, it will pave the way for future laws in other states. If you live in Washington — please vote YES on 522! If you have friends in Washington, please urge them to vote YES too!

We should all get to know what's in our food.