Member Photo

Hames & Axle Farm

"We Grow Awareness"
(Ashburnham, Massachusetts)

Food System 4.0

When we look at how Americans got their food since beginning of the nation, we are embarking on our fourth “age of rebirth.” What will it look like in a decade?

When the first settlers came from Europe they brought some food with them, though much of it didn’t thrive in the climate of a coastal village. The animals they brought had to be strong, and versatile, so they were very practical, small in stature, and hardy. Seeds had to adapt to different soils, climates and predators. And then there was the practicality, that they were colonists from a “mother land,” and as such, would still purchase goods from home when they could.

As the people moved inland they had to adapt native plants to their diet, or their diet to the native plants. Foraging was only good seasonally, and winter’s were hard with no fresh fruit, vegetables or probably eggs. They had to develop a new way of getting food, most of being grown by themselves, or by their neighbors. Grains, meat, vegetables, fruits, and some clothing, had to come from their own work.  This is the way Americans lived for over a hundred years. Even city dwellers had kitchen gardens, pigs in the backyard and chickens running around the neighborhood. It wasn’t until the mid 20th century that public health officials became aware of the health issues associated with poultry, manure and keeping livestock in close confinement.  More than 80% of Americans were involved in some sort of agriculture, from orcharding to livestock.

There was no refrigeration that was easily affordable, except ice. It was common that people bought their dinner at the market, alive, even if they lived in New York City. Knowing what was safe and what was not, was part of survival.

After refrigeration became affordable, following World War II, the government encouraged a centralization of the population. The interstate highway system allowed people to move from one city to another, and cities grew in the age of suburbanization.  People began accepting food that was prepared by someone else. Not just being killed without their awareness, but after the TV dinner was invented, it became a special event to have someone else do all the cooking. Before, that was reserved for the wealthy who could afford a housekeeper and cook. Now, everyone felt that wealthy. No more hours in the kitchen.

But along with that freedom from the farm grew an ignorance of what was being done on the farm. Agriculture moved from small, diversified farms where animals were named and only extras were sold.  They became larger, monoculture operations where almost no animals stayed for any length of time. Whenever they got older and began suffering health affects, they were sold. As that happened, farmers stopped selecting for longevity and started breeding for rapid growth rates. The faster they grew, the faster they brought money in.

And people began shopping by price point, not by quality. They couldn’t see the live animal, so they didn’t know what healthy skin looked like. They started hearing claims like “grain fed,” and “healthy,” and assumed that those chubby chickens were healthier than the scrawny ones.  What they didn’t know was that “chubby chickens” were injected with fluids to make them look that way. Few people read the labels that say “water added.”

So now we have a food system where the healthiest food is reserved either for those who grow it themselves, or the ones who can afford to buy it.  We have entire urban and rural populations without access to a grocery store, or affordable quality, healthy food.  Price point shopping gets high fat, high sodium, highly processed food rather than a full meal that can be reused for a second, third, or fourth meal. And our livestock is so unhealthy that it has to have anti-biotics to grow “fast enough,” or to survive the conditions in which they are raised.  We favor “white veal,” when that really means a calf raised on milk beyond the time when its healthy to be that way. The white meat is undeveloped muscle, and anemia, yet we pay premium money for this “delicacy.” 

But people are waking up. They are remembering the lessons our ancestors knew – fresh food is better than stale, dirt is alive, not dangerous, we all breathe the same air, and more.  These people want fresh food, close to home. Some are willing to grow it, where they can. But not everyone has room for a garden, or a barn. So how do they get that fresh food?

That’s where the new foodways come in to play.  Rather than keep the middleman, people are selling directly from producer to consumer.  People are rediscovering how to cook, or preserve their only food. They are recognizing the difference between fresh and processed, and they want more of it. Food hubs will allow producers to extend their sales beyond their neighborhood by transporting from one hub to another. Some who don’t want to grow their own food will make a living providing that transportation. Community facilities will allow home cooks to develop new products with food hub transportation systems, and a new economy will grow.

That’s what we’re working on at North Country Sustainability Center.  We don’t want to grow everyone’s food. We want people to be able to access and use good, locally grown food. We want others to develop their hobbies into businesses if they want, and to extend their markets without selling their rights away to a major food label. Our goal is to help move in the growth of this FS4.0, by aiding in it’s birth and helping others adopt it in their regions. Won’t you help us? Give a little to www.indiegogo.com/NCSCIngredients and share in the “caretaking” of this new concept. Thanks.


Pat_4
05:01 PM EDT
 

NAIS Comes Back With a New Name

The USDA announced today, through the Federal Registry, the new Animal Disease Traceability Program.  It looks suspiciously like NAIS, with added components that will really bog producers and service professionals down with red tape and accountability. Despite all the comments the USDA heard about how deleterious this program will be to the small farmer, and the status of the US Economy, and federal budget, they put this out. We have 90 days to comment on it. Please do, and spread the word.

Consumers and Independent Producers Lose if Big Ag Wins on Animal Tracking

WASHINGTON, DC (August 9, 2011): The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) today released a new proposed rule for mandatory animal traceability.While USDA already has traceability requirements as part of existing animal disease control programs, the proposed rule goes much further to require animal tagging and tracing without specific disease threats.The rule has raised significant concerns among family farm and ranch advocates, who accuse the agency of failing to provide a coherent, factual explanation of the program’s necessity.

“USDA brags about the success of past programs, but has abandoned the principles that made them successful,” argued Bill Bullard, CEO of R-CALF USA.“Past programs were based on sound science and were developed in response to the transmission, treatment, and elimination of specific identified diseases.USDA’s new approach is a one-size-fits-all approach that does not specifically aim at the control of livestock diseases.”

The proposed rule greatly expands what animals must be identified, including feeder cattle, which are processed at a young age and never enter the breeding herd.

“The large volume of the animals that USDA proposes to track could overwhelm the capabilities of state agencies, making it impossible to retrieve useful data if there is in fact a disease outbreak,” stated Gilles Stockton, a Montana rancher and member of the Western Organization of Resource Councils.

The proposed rule creates new requirements for not only animal owners, but also for businesses associated with livestock.For example, veterinarians and auction barns would be required to keep records on every tagged animal for a minimum of five years.

“On the one hand, the agency points to diseases with long incubation periods, such as tuberculosis, to justify these extensive new recordkeeping requirements,” notes Judith McGeary, Executive Director of the Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance and vice-chair of the USDA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Animal Health.“But, at the same time, the agency plans to require the same paperwork on feeder cattle, which are butchered between one and two years of age.So the majority of the records that the vets and auction barns will be storing will be on animals that died years before.All this does is impose unnecessary burdens on small businesses, accelerating the loss of independent businesses to corporate industrial-scale agribusiness.”

“Consumers need the USDA to start focusing on the animal health and food safety risks posed by industrialized meat production,” said Patty Lovera, Assistant Director of Food & Water Watch.“If USDA devoted as much energy to preventing animal diseases as it has to promoting animal tracking, our food system would be in much better shape.”

The USDA has presented its traceability scheme as an animal health program, but it has emphasized the importance of the export market to the United States in promoting its new plan. The powerful meatpacking lobby has continued to push for such mandated traceability requirements in order to develop international standards for exports.Critics have suggested this is not in the American public’s best interest, however, since the U.S. is a net importer of beef and cattle and the profits from the export market go to a small handful of massive meatpacking companies.

“If Americans don’t want their food supply to cave like the banking and housing industries, they need to urge the USDA to re-write the rule to address the needs of family farmers rather than the meatpacking lobby," stated Mark A. Kastel, senior farm policy analyst at The Cornucopia Institute.

###

For more information, contact:

Judith McGeary, Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance, 512-484-8821

Bill Bullard, R-CALF USA, 406-252-2516

Patty Lovera, Food & Water Watch, 202-683-2465

Gilles Stockton, Western Organization of Resource Councils, 406-366-4463

Mark Kastel, The Cornucopia Institute, 608-778-2038

Pat_4
03:26 PM EDT
 

New Non-Profit in Ashburnham

Central MA and the Monadnock region have a new resource coming. The North Country Sustainability Center, Inc. just received its notification that we've been granted 501(c) (3)status!  Now we can start raising the money to purchase the riding stable and manufacturing facility to start the gardens, kitchen, creamery, arts center and expo facility.

Check us out at www.northcountrysustain.org  and see what we're working on. It will make a lot of dreams possible, and help others just hold on to their homes, or make their community a more pleasant place to be. We are taking memberships, donations, and ideas. We hope you'll join us in our plans and help make this region more sustainable for the future.

Pat_4
07:42 AM EDT
 

Growing Potential in Central MA

I just wanted to let you all know about a new project in the works in
North Central Massachusetts. Called the North Country Sustainability Center, Inc. if we reach our goal we will operate a sustainable ag/arts/economic development center for everyone to use. NCSC will include a commercial kitchen, a micro-creamery, eventually a smokehouse and wood fired oven, along with community gardens, classes in practical skill such as sewing, cooking, farming, woodworking, and offering acoustic performances and
demonstrations in various forms of art.  We just got approved for incorporation, and now how have to complete the non-profit status, but you can learn more about us at www.northcountrysustain.org. or follow us on
Facebook.
We are trying to purchase the facility, which includes 6 acres, and 4 buildings, including an indoor riding arena. Help if you can. Thanks,
Pat_4
05:25 AM EST
 

TOPICS